VOI Methodology
Value has two major components: cost and benefits. Benefits for K-12 include monetary benefits (such as cost savings)
and qualitative benefits which are oriented to district or school mission, goals and mandates. CoSN is looking forward
to your feedback to make VOI more useful; please submit questions and suggestions via
Contact Us.
- Estimate Project Costs (Project TCO)
To properly implement and support the technology project, all initial and ongoing direct costs need to be budgeted.
However, to determine the relative value of the proposed project, budgeted costs need to be annualized and indirect
costs (user overhead time) need to be considered; these combined annualized costs are the project TCO. CoSN has provided
a free web-based Project Cost Estimator to help you to identify and summarize all of these costs.
- Calculate Anticipated Savings and Revenues
Most projects, even those focused on qualitative benefits such as student achievement, have some cost savings such as
lower out-of-pocket costs, better efficiencies, user productivity or future cost avoidance. There may also be some
anticipated increase of revenues based on higher attendance, grants or state/federal aid. The
Project Cost Estimator allows you to identify and apply some of the savings to the
project cost, and the VOI Project Benefits Worksheet will help you to
identify dollar savings and apply them as benefits.
- Measure (Score) “Qualitative” Benefits
Since the business of schools is education and schools operate for the public good, many or most of the benefits of
implementing technology can not be measured in terms of dollars; we call these qualitative benefits. For these to be
considered benefits they must directly or indirectly affect the school or district mission, goals or mandates. CoSN has
provided a spreadsheet to help you to identify and apply these qualitative
benefits. The suggested approach to calculating these anticipated benefits is:
- Determine school or district mission, goals and mandates, and assign a relative importance to each
- Align anticipated project benefits with the appropriate school mission, goals and mandates
- State the anticipated project benefits in measurable terms
- Agree on the effect of the proposed project on applicable mission, goals and mandates. (On a weighting of -10 to +10, how much will the project affect each mission, goal and mandate? Note the possibility of negative effect)
- Come up with a total qualitative benefits score
- Multiply the total qualitative score by the probability of success for a risk-weighted benefits score
- Assess Risk
Risk, as used for the purposes of VOI calculations, is more appropriately viewed as the probability of success for the
proposed project. Probability of success is most appropriately applied to the valuation of the expected benefits of the
project (Note that probability of success could also be applied against cost to create a risk-weighted cost). Although
actual benefits if realized aren’t lowered by a lower probability of success, this factor must be considered when
determining whether a project is worth doing, or which project competing for the same funds makes most sense to pursue.
There are approaches that have been developed for the corporate world that evaluate risk for technology projects; CoSN
has not yet investigated this area and suggest that for now, a general consensus of the school or district project team
reach a consensus on the probability of success.
- Was it worth it? - Evaluate Results
Once your wildly successful project has been implemented, you have an opportunity to objectively review actual costs and
benefits versus the projected costs and benefits. This will allow you to concisely respond to the project skeptics. As
the anticipated costs and benefits were stated in measurable terms, the actual results can be measured:
- Actual costs versus anticipated costs
- Actual savings or revenues versus anticipated savings revenue
- Actual benefits versus anticipated benefits
“In today’s constrained economy technology expenditures are competing for scarce funding.
School leaders do not understand how to plan for the costs of technology or the expected value of those investments.
Your Value of Investment Leadership Initiative is a valuable asset for the K-12 educator. Thank you.”
—Charles Sipos
Executive Director Information Technology, Fulton County (GA) Schools
|